Humanoid Scott says the hand video still has an AI tell
A clip posted with the caption "It's over" gets a frame-by-frame rebuttal from one account, and nobody else has checked the call.
A video of a pair of hands went around with a two word caption from @snz_btc, "It's over". Humanoid Scott watched it and said it is good but not perfect.
AI still has a tell
Yup, rings always go on the right middle finger, not the ring finger.
His case is a list of physical details rather than a vibe. The necklace, he says, could not have been clasped, because there is too much hair behind the neck, the hands never come close together, and the whole thing happens too quickly. In a follow up he adds another one, that rings always go on the right middle finger, not the ring finger.
Why hands
Hands are the part everyone checks first, and they are also the part that matters if you care about robots. A clip of hands doing fine manipulation is the same thing a manipulation researcher stares at when they are deciding whether a policy did the task or a cut did it for them. The tell Humanoid Scott is pointing at is not a weird finger count. It is a sequence that skips a step. The clasp never gets the moment it would need in the real world, so the result appears without the motion that produces it.
That is the same failure mode people look for in robot demos. Did the gripper actually close on the object, or did the frame jump. Is the timing plausible for a body with two arms and a limited reach. Speed is the giveaway in both cases.
Shown versus claimed
This is one account reading one video frame by frame. Nobody else in the thread has checked the call, and the sources do not say what tool made the clip or whether it was generated at all. Humanoid Scott does not say it is fake outright. He says it is good, and then lists what does not add up.
His summary is four words long.